Skip to content

The Empire State Building is Dissing Mother Teresa

June 10, 2010

The Catholic League put in a request months ago to have the Empire State Building lit up in her order’s colors on her 100th birthday this August. The request was denied, and no explanation was given.

There are many news articles documenting this story. Here’s one.

Please sign the petition at in support of Mother Teresa and join the Facebook page as well. Thanks.

Update from the Catholic League on

Anthony Malkin, owner of the Empire State Building, released a statement yesterday saying, “As a privately owned building, ESB has a specific policy against any other lighting for religious figures or requests by religions and religious organizations.”

Commenting is Catholic League president Bill Donohue:

Malkin is either misinformed or he is lying. Here’s the proof: When John Cardinal O’Connor died in 2000, the Empire State Building was lighted in red and white; in 2005, when Pope John Paul II died, the tower lights were extinguished in his honor; also in 2005, the tower was aglow in yellow, red and blue in tribute to the 125th anniversary of the Salvation Army; and every year the colors red, black and green are lit in memory of Rev. Martin Luther King. In other words, there is no policy barring religious figures or organizations from being honored.

When I applied to the Empire State Building on February 2, I received a phone call from Nicole Grzywacz, Public Relations and Events Coordinator, saying the application had been received. She never indicated there was any policy which would prohibit my request. Indeed, when I spoke to her assistant, Stacy Ann, she never implied that there was a problem.

Malkin has made his decision to stiff Catholics. I have made mine: We will call off our petition drive, but we will go forward with our demonstration outside the Empire State Building on August 26. His decision to double down at this juncture—in the face of massive support for our request—is something he will regret for the rest of his life.

One Comment leave one →
  1. June 11, 2010 3:31 pm

    Donahue’s Irish temper approach to nearly everything can be counterproductive. Some people can see his approach as a challenge as to whether they will do his bidding out of fear of his later denouncing them should they not do his bidding. So maybe this tycoon just met Donahue’s challenge and said no.
    We need for there to be a Catholic ambassador to the outer world that does not use this latent vinegar of ad hominems should the institution not do our bidding.
    My own take is that the owner could have recently thought out the scenario of eventually Islam asking him to honor some of their particular people. That consideration would then lead to a new policy that would exclude all new religious figures and he would rather not spell out such a policy in public.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: